Wednesday, February 13, 2008

My Obama Prediction Explained

Given the push back I have received from my last post on the state of the primary race, I thought I would further elaborate my thinking behind predicting an Obama victory this early.

After further thought, I realize that it was way premature to be making any predictions but I guess I'm getting antsy with this primary that just keeps dragging on. Don't get me wrong, I am loving all the excitement, the incredible turnout on the Democratic side, and the two wonderful and extremely capable candidates. I just want this thing to be decided and hope that whoever wins makes the other his/her running mate. It seems I'm a "bi-candidate" like Margaret Cho. In a recent article at The Huffington Post, Cho said:

I am bi-candidate. I like Hillary and Obama. I like Obama and Hillary. I think it is wonderful that we have not just one, but two great candidates to choose from. It is an embarrassment of riches really. Not just one amazing politician. But two! We have the incredibly exciting Barack Obama, who represents hope and change and who can get a whole generation of disillusioned voters excited about politics again, which I think I is a miracle in itself. Then we have the amazing Hillary Clinton, who has already proved herself to be a great leader, who can and will clean up after the Bush administration just like she did the last time she was president.
So, we have two great candidates, I like them both, but why do I think that Obama is going to win?

1. Obama will win Wisconsin decisively.
  • As Dan, who is from Wisconsin has noted, his state has historically been quite progressive and according to a number of reports, Obama has an advantage in terms of organization and key endorsements.
  • Last night, Obama delivered a speech to a soldout 18,000+ crowd in Madison, WI. These crowds continue to be amazing and they are not only coming to hear Obama speak but also turning out to vote.
  • The latest poll, from Feb 8-10, already has Obama ahead and doesn't include any momentum from the decisive wins in D.C., Maryland and Virginia.
  • Update: New Rasmussen poll shows Obama up 47 to 43.
  • Clinton also has been campaigning in Texas and seems to be not contesting Wisconsin with the full force of her campaign.
  • Wisconsin is an open primary so independent voters should also help Obama.
2. The Clinton campaign is in the midst of internal turmoil at its highest ranks with the top two campaign staff leaving as well as two key staffers from the internet division. Also, Clinton is raising half as much money as Obama and he will be able to outspend her in the weeks leading up to March 4th.

3. After three full weeks of positive media coverage for Obama and clear momentum against Clinton, I think it is likely that she lose one of Ohio or Texas.
  • Looking at the exit polling from Virginia and Maryland we see that for the first time Obama beat or broke even with Clinton in certain key demographics. Obama tied Clinton among Latino voters and white women. Further, Obama beat Clinton among voters over the age of 60 and among voters who earned less than $50,000. Both groups had previously been solidly behind Clinton.
  • The process for apportioning delegates in Texas benefits Obama, especially since he will gain more delegates from his margins of victory in urban areas. Even if Hillary wins the statewide vote, the delegate count will likely be a draw.
If the above takes place, I believe Clinton's support among super delegates collapses and that she won't stay in until Pennsylvania votes on April 22.

~BT

4 comments:

albert said...

I think a lot of Obama's latest surge has to do with how the media interpreted the results of Super Tuesday. Clinton walked away with the big prizes, but all throughout the day pundits were talking about how that was all expected and Obama would be expected to win the Potomac states et. al.

The super tuesday analysis really seemed to rob Clinton of a lot of the momentum she might have gotten out of her big win in California.

Brett said...

I would agree with you that the positive media attention that Obama has received is helping quite a bit.

The thing about Super Tuesday is that Clinton did quite poorly considering that she had such a dominant lead weeks prior.

Even though Clinton won the big states, the wins were by small margins leading to closer delegate splits than Obama's more decisive wins.

albert said...

There was an interesting piece I read a few weeks ago about how most of the candidates "surges" or "collapses" just prior to election day are not actually shifts in opinion but just the result of voters waiting until the last minute or last day to make up their minds.

What that says to me is that in the weeks leading up to Super Tuesday, Clinton didn't really have such a commanding lead, it was just inaccurate polling.

ebizz said...

If you look closely at exit polls coming out of Super Tuesday -- and even from the Potomac Primaries -- Clinton dominates Obama among people who made up their minds within the last 3 days. Even in states she lost like Alabama, Connecticut, and Maryland, she still got the majority of votes from people who were undecided going into the last few days of campaigning.

A Clinton supporter like myself would argue that the late "surge" in support is because undecided voters finally sit down, tune out the hype about Obama along with his (eloquent, yet) fanciful speeches, and come to the serious conclusion that she is better suited to be President.

A non-Clinton supporter or an "outside observer" would probably argue along the same lines, just with less anti-Obama rhetoric... when the TV goes off and all that's in front of the undecided voter is a sheet of paper with side by side comparisons of the candidates (and that IS how informed people end up deciding) Hillary Clinton has a more convincing case than Barack Obama.

So how does this relate to Wisconsin? Well, in the Rasmussen Poll you cited (conducted on 2/13 among 855 likely Democratic primary voters) 10% of the respondents are undecided. Never mind the +/-4% margin of error, which covers the entire spread of the poll. But undecided voters -- who are most likely to have made up their minds some time in the last three days -- may be the swing factor in this particular race. Let's not forget that on top of all of that, Wisconsin has an open primary and so it may be moderate Republicans who favor Clinton's more fiscally conservative principles that put her over the top. Sure, this is a race for the nomination of the Democratic Party, so send a letter to the DNC if you think that's unfair.

Here are some of the recent exit poll results in response to the question: When did you decide your vote?

Alabama
Last 3 Days - Clinton 53%, Obama 43%
Today - Clinton 58%, Obama 39%

Connecticut
Last 3 Days - Clinton 46%, Obama 50%
Today - Clinton 51%, Obama 43%

Maryland
Today - Clinton 48%, Obama 41%

New Jersey
Last 3 Days - Clinton 53%, Obama 42%
Today - Clinton 53%, Obama 40%
Last Week - Clinton 46%, Obama 48%
Last Month - Clinton 44%, Obama 54%